Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)
Term · Law · MLC-T-LAW-002389
A United States Supreme Court case that addressed the rights of a U.S. citizen designated as an enemy combatant and detained indefinitely without charge during the War on Terror. The Court ruled that even enemy combatants who are U.S. citizens have a right to due process and must be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for their detention before a neutral decision-maker. This decision affirmed the principle of habeas corpus for citizens.
| Identifier | MLC-T-LAW-002389 |
|---|---|
| Field | Law |
Record as JSON
{
"id": "MLC-T-LAW-002389",
"term": "Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)",
"field": "Law",
"definition": "A United States Supreme Court case that addressed the rights of a U.S. citizen designated as an enemy combatant and detained indefinitely without charge during the War on Terror. The Court ruled that even enemy combatants who are U.S. citizens have a right to due process and must be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for their detention before a neutral decision-maker. This decision affirmed the principle of habeas corpus for citizens.",
"url": "https://mlchart.com/terminology/law/hamdi-v-rumsfeld-2004/"
}
Record 2,304 of 5,439 in Law terminology (MLC-0107). Request the full dataset.