MLchartDataset catalogue

Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants (1994)

Term · Law · MLC-T-LAW-003032

A landmark product liability case where a jury awarded substantial damages to Stella Liebeck, who suffered severe burns from spilled hot coffee purchased at a McDonald's drive-thru. The case highlighted issues of corporate responsibility, product warnings, and the concept of punitive damages. It is often cited in discussions about tort reform and frivolous lawsuits, despite the jury finding McDonald's 80% at fault.

Table 1. Record
IdentifierMLC-T-LAW-003032
FieldLaw
Record as JSON
{
  "id": "MLC-T-LAW-003032",
  "term": "Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants (1994)",
  "field": "Law",
  "definition": "A landmark product liability case where a jury awarded substantial damages to Stella Liebeck, who suffered severe burns from spilled hot coffee purchased at a McDonald's drive-thru. The case highlighted issues of corporate responsibility, product warnings, and the concept of punitive damages. It is often cited in discussions about tort reform and frivolous lawsuits, despite the jury finding McDonald's 80% at fault.",
  "url": "https://mlchart.com/terminology/law/liebeck-v-mcdonalds-restaurants-1994/"
}

Record 2,984 of 5,439 in Law terminology (MLC-0107). Request the full dataset.