MLchartDataset catalogue

Vega v. Tekoh (2022)

Term · Law · MLC-T-LAW-005143

A United States Supreme Court case that held that a violation of the Miranda warnings requirement does not, by itself, provide a basis for a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court clarified that Miranda warnings establish a prophylactic rule, not a constitutional right in itself. This decision limits the ability to sue police officers for failing to provide Miranda warnings.

Table 1. Record
IdentifierMLC-T-LAW-005143
FieldLaw
Record as JSON 
{
  "id": "MLC-T-LAW-005143",
  "term": "Vega v. Tekoh (2022)",
  "field": "Law",
  "definition": "A United States Supreme Court case that held that a violation of the Miranda warnings requirement does not, by itself, provide a basis for a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court clarified that Miranda warnings establish a prophylactic rule, not a constitutional right in itself. This decision limits the ability to sue police officers for failing to provide Miranda warnings.",
  "url": "https://mlchart.com/terminology/law/vega-v-tekoh-2022/"
}

Record 5,271 of 5,445 in Law terminology (MLC-0107). Request the full dataset.